Personality Beats Polish
Why AI has triggered demand for a new, unexpected skillset to enable effective influencing work
In the late 1920s, Hollywood was rapidly transformed by newly-invented sound films playing in theatres with dialogue synchronised to actors’ lips. Overnight, established film actorsused to silent films needed new skills to match the technology – and many fell by the wayside, to be usurped by a new generation.
Today’s influence landscape shows signs of a changing of the guard, too. The top ranks of the 2026 Tyto Tech 500, particularly in the UK and the US, are tilted towards a new set of influential business leaders: names like Demis Hassabis, Mustafa Suleyman, Sam Altman, and Dario Amodei have rapidly emerged over the last few years as a near-permanent presence in news cycles and cultural conversations.
13% of the 2026 Tech 500 are AI influencers – 4.3 times as many as in 2023.
Partly, of course, that is a simple effect of the broader AI hype curve, as these figures became the go-to voices for the big business and technology story of our age. But their visibility also shows how influence can be built across different settings and formats.
The option was there for the Altmans and Amodeis of the AI revolution to take a back seat to their businesses and their technologies, letting their companies – or indeed their own chatbots – do most of the talking. Instead, they are highly visible across mainstream media, social platforms and longer-form channels, communicating both through established outlets and more directly with their audiences.
Their influence does not come from any one channel in isolation, but from the cumulative effect of being recognisable and familiar across different platforms and formats, while also having a visible presence in earned media. It builds on the ‘multi-hyphenate’ trend we identified in 2025: influence increasingly plays out across different settings, each asking something different of the person communicating.
“Empathy and humanity [are what now makes someone in tech worth listening to]. There’s so much anxiety right now; tech leaders need to drop the jargon, talk like people and relate to people’s concerns.”
Ben Wyskida, Senior Communications and Brand Advisor at Mozilla
That’s because polished summaries and broadly-applicable insight – the kinds of content we are most likely to produce when speaking in a nameless ‘brand voice’ – are now effectively free. What’s much harder to replicate is personal experience: what someone has learned, seen or discovered for themselves. In a world of abundant content, that has luxury value.
There is a parallel move happening in the news media itself. Newspapers once saw the ‘editorial leader’ – a column written in the name of the paper, collectively backed by the editorial staff – as the focal point for intervening in national and international conversations. Now, journalists are also working across social media, video, podcasts and newsletters, putting their faces at the forefront of the publications they work for.
If that is the new model of success for journalism, it will obviously suit some more than others. Like the development of the talkies, it means that the same job suddenly requires a different skillset. The same is increasingly true for corporate spokespeople. A tightly controlled three-minute broadcast interview, a 45-minute podcast conversation, an on-stage discussion and a written opinion piece all ask different things of the person delivering them.
The ability to be controlled and disciplined remains important, particularly in crisis situations. But spontaneity, curiosity, storytelling, and the confidence to explore an idea rather than simply recite an established position are now equally important tools.
“With the increasing amount of AI-generated content, the real art is making it not sound AI-generated. That means conveying a unique and authentic perspective shaped by personality and experience. From my point of view, it’s not only acceptable but can be beneficial to express emotions and demonstrate humanity, something AI is not yet able to do.”
Saskia Stähle-Thamm, Senior Director, International Communications & PR at Zendesk
The challenge of pivoting spokespeople towards a new way of speaking and thinking is also, however, an opportunity for brand guardians to pursue a different, more fulfilling approach to communications. Realising the value of personality also means being less risk-averse and more strongly prioritising creativity, originality, and fun in B2B communications – and those are ingredients that can lead to great campaigns we are passionate about building.
The aim isn’t to manufacture a personality. It is to give the right people the right space for the one they already have to shine through.
“I look for people who stay real, transparent, and humble. AI is a great tool, but when someone hands their voice over to it just to churn out content faster than before, I stop tuning in.”
Meghan Fintland, Head of Global PR at Rubrik
What this means
for comms leaders
Don’t expect every spokesperson to succeed in every format. Identify where each person is naturally strongest – whether that’s a broadcast interview, podcast, stage, social platform or written opinion – and build their influence from there.
Preparation and message discipline remain important, but leave room for personality, curiosity and spontaneity. Too much preparation can strip away the very qualities that make someone worth listening to.
Up Next: Gather Round and Share
Influence grows when people keep coming back. The next chapter looks at how influential voices build communities around their ideas.